RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01596
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His military records be corrected to show he was in an Active
Duty (AD) status from 14 Aug 13 to 16 Mar 14.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He returned from deployment injured and should have been kept on
AD status while a Line of Duty (LOD) determination and Medical
Continuation (MEDCON) order were in process.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a Reservist who was ordered to AD at Dobbins
Air Reserve Base, GA from 27 Dec 12 to 7 Aug 13. During the
time period of the order, the applicant deployed to Afghanistan
and injured his left ankle.
On 5 Nov 13, after his return from his deployment and expiration
of AD orders, an Informal Line of Duty Determination (ILOD),
AFRC IMT 348, was initiated regarding the applicants ankle
injury.
On 19 Nov 13, the recommended finding was that the ankle injury
was ILOD.
On 18 Dec 13, the ILOD, AFRC IMT 348, was approved indicating
the applicant had sprained his left ankle in the line of duty
while playing basketball on 29 Jun 13 at Camp Phoenix,
Afghanistan.
From 17 Mar 14 to 3 Jul 14 the applicant was placed on Medical
Continuation (MEDCON) orders per the AFPC/DPFA advisory, dated
29 May 14.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPFA recommends disapproval, indicating there is no
evidence the government or organizations within the government
made a mistake. The Service Member (SM) received a finalized
LOD which gives him access to care at military treatment
facilities or a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) facility
to receive additional medical care. The applicant was eligible
for the Transition Assistance Management Program (TAMP), which
provides 180 days of premium-free transitional health care
benefits after regular TRICARE benefits end.
The MEDCON Program is voluntary according to Secretary of the
Air Force (SAF) policy. An SM may be eligible for MEDCON orders
when an injury, illness, or disease is incurred or aggravated
while serving on orders and that condition renders the Airman
unable to perform military duties. MEDCON eligibility requires
an LOD determination and a finding by a credentialed military
health care provider that the Airman has an unresolved health
condition requiring treatment and renders the Airman unable to
meet retention or mobility standards In Accordance With (IAW)
AFI 48-123, Medical Examinations and Standards, chapters 5 and
13. The applicant did not provide any type of explanation as to
why the MEDCON request was not submitted at the conclusion of
the active duty tour (10 U.S.C. 12301(d) orders [27 Dec 12-7 Aug
13]), but did indicate medical treatment was being administered
based on the injury highlighted within the LOD.
The complete DPFA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFBCMR Medical Consultant concurs with the DPFA assessment. No
objective Service medical evidence has been supplied upon which
to make a reasoned assessment of the applicants petition.
Examples of required evidence would include profile
restrictions, e.g., AF Form 422, Physical Profile Serial Report,
or an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, prohibiting
performance of certain duties, to include the AF Fitness
Assessment and/or Mobility, initiated during the applicants
period of active service or demobilization.
The complete AFBCMR evaluation is at Exhibit D.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded by stating when he returned from
deployment and in-processed, he reported that he was having
issues with his ankle. He states he was told to see his
civilian provider and return with those records. When he turned
in those records, his orders were not extended. He indicates he
learned at a later date, that his orders should have been
extended and he should have been sent to a military provider for
evaluation.
He further states he had surgery 25 Nov 13, but up until that
time he was using his personal leave to attend medical
appointments and physical therapy. New MEDCON orders were
finally approved and started 17 Mar 14. On 2 May 14, he had a
second ankle surgery and was still under the doctors care as of
the date of his response.
The applicant provided his Notification of Air Force Members
Qualification Status, AF Form 422, dated 31 Jul 14, which
indicated that the applicant was not authorized duty assignments
under field conditions and was not able to occupy a mobility
position.
The applicant provided his Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated
19 Aug 14, which referenced his assignment limitation code and
his fitness assessment restrictions in regards to the run/walk,
push-ups, and sit-ups.
The applicants complete response is at Exhibit E.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an injustice. After a thorough
review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete
submission, we believe the applicant is the victim of an error
or injustice. We note the comments of AFPC/DPFA, indicating the
applicant did not provide any type of explanation as to why the
MEDCON request was not submitted at the conclusion of the AD
tour, and of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant that no objective
Service medical evidence has been supplied upon which to make a
reasoned assessment of the applicants petition. However, we
believe the applicant was not afforded appropriate counseling
upon expiration of his active duty orders in regards to MEDCON
orders, the resolution of his injury, and future treatment for
his injury. This rationale is supported by the fact that the
applicant was later put on MEDCON orders from 17 Mar 14 to 3 Jul
14, and that both the AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force
Members Qualification Status, dated 31 Jul 14, and the Air Form
469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 14 Nov 14, indicate
the applicant was placed on duty restrictions concerning field
condition assignments and fitness assessment limitations. In
view of this, we believe the applicant has provided sufficient
evidence to warrant his continued active duty status while his
medical condition was being properly resolved. Therefore, we
recommend the applicants records be corrected as indicated
below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was
not released from active duty on 8 August 2013, but was
continued on active duty until 3 July 2014.
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01596 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Apr 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPFA, dated 29 May 14.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFBCMR, dated 7 Nov 14.
Exhibit E. Applicants Response, dated 11 Dec 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01410
Upon returning from his AD deployment in 2012 he was denied Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders and pay by his medical group, and he should have been considered for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). On 12 Dec 12, the Connecticut IG rendered a determination that the applicants contested injury was incurred while serving on AD, and, as he was found fit for duty, no MEDCON orders were warranted. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02294
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While the applicant is eligible to receive care for the injury incurred in the LOD at any military treatment facility, recommend denying his request for MEDCON orders due to lack of credible...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01087
During that time he received two in the LOD injuries. The SAF/AA policy states that airmen are entitled to be returned to active duty to satisfy pay and entitlements, medical evaluation and treatment and processing through the DES but they must have a medical diagnosis rendering them unable to perform military duties and a LOD determination documenting that the injury/illness was incurred or aggravated in the LOD. In this case, the applicant was injured on active duty but was cleared to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02125
Statements in his records indicate that the patients condition is unfitting for military service and that an MEB will be initiated. c. On 14 May 12, the applicant was issued an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition (DLC) Report, on which the military health care provider recommended duty and mobility restrictions of no participation because, This member is undergoing an MEB to determine medical fitness for continued worldwide duty and retention. d. On 16 Aug 12, an Informal LOD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04411
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04411 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Title 10 Military Personnel Appropriation (MPA) active duty orders for the period of 1 October 2010, through 30 September 2011 be amended to show the she was continued on active duty Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders until 31 December 2012. In...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00276
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00276 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records reflect that he was not released from his active duty orders on 20 May 2011 but continued on those orders through 16 Mar 2012 when his Line of Duty (LOD) was completed. The applicants condition was an injury and thus did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02159
It would not be appropriate to place the applicant on MEDCON orders from 6 November 2012 through 21 March 2013 because he was able to perform military duties as stated on the doctors slip from his civilian provider. His civilian doctor cannot find him fit for duty or grant him a military waiver, only the military can make this determination. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02147
________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends approval, noting the applicants record should be amended to reflect, as a minimum, the applicant was placed on active duty orders for pay and points on 5 Mar 11 and remained so until his medical retirement effective 29 Aug 12. The applicants request is duly noted; however, we did not find the evidence provided substantial enough to override the opinions...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03271
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03271 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was on Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders from 1 Dec 2011 through 30 Aug 2012 and that he receive full pay, benefits and service credit for this period. In support of his request, the applicant provides...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03094
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03094 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive retirement points for the period 27 Sep 10 through 1 Apr 12 rather than Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay). In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; active duty orders for the period, 2 Jun 26 Sep...